BVITS (Business Value Innovative Thinking Symbols) is a systematic thinking
methods for creative and breakthrough ideas on demand. By following BVITS,
users can come out with break through ideas quickly. Even though BVITS is easy to learn, it is extensible to suit the domain of your problem or business
and making BVITS very powerful.
BVITS is the combinations and extractions of many creative thinking
methods such as the TRIZ method, Mind mapping, Axiomatic Design, Blue
Ocean Value Innovation Strategies, Value Engineering, Structured
Methods, Problem Solving Methods and others.
read more...
BVITS operators symbols are eseentially mathematics
operators. So BVITS can also be known as Innovation Math. For details and
other tips ... read more...
Do you know how much you spend on information technology each year? Giving
some allowances for the debates and uncertainties in the classification of what
constitute information technology expenditures, the answer is easily derived.
But what does this figure mean? "Is it enough for my business?" or "Have I
overspent on IT?". Over the years, I am frequently asked by CEOs, CFOs and CIOs,
"What is right amount of expenditure for information technology?" "What is the
right percentage of IT expenditure over revenues?". Management wants to spend
enough on IT to ensure competitiveness. A typical consultant answer, especially
from the quality management people, will be benchmarking. Everyone wants to
follow the leaders, so average spending is not the answer. They want to know
what the successful companies spend on IT? The answer is a range 0.5%-10%. That
is too broad. What about only the leaders in their sector of business. The
answer is also a range, albeit a narrower range. Over the years, academics have
been trying hard to find a correlation between IT expenditure and the
profitability of business. Despite various ways of classifying expenditures and
valuation of businesses, there do not seem to be a definitive pattern. Some
losers spend much more than the leaders on IT expenditures (percentage wise).
I think we have asked the wrong question and hence get never get the right
answer.
read more.....
This is the most provocative article on IT in 2003.
It resulted in lots of responses and altogether contribute greatly to better
understanding in the use and management of IT for business.
"The New Rule of IT Management becomes
Spend
less; Follow, don't lead; Focus on vulnerabilities, not
opportunities."
Why IT Does Matter
August 25, 2003 by F. Warren McFarlan and Richard
L. Nolan
"HBS professors F. Warren McFarlan and Richard L. Nolan respond to the
much-discussed assertion by Nicholas Carr that company investments in IT are
less and less likely to produce competitive advantage. "
"IT can change rules and assumptions about competition, knock down
limitations"
"Often, only the senior management team's imagination limits new IT-based
opportunities."
"IT-enabled competitive applications, like many competitive advantages, don't
endure"
" the quality of IT
management matters even more as the IT commodity becomes ubiquitous."
"Why not IT as the "flexible information factory" instead of the ubiquitous
information utility? "
"Comparing IT to a factory instead of a utility would undermine Carr's thesis."
"What Carr fails to recognize is that IT can profoundly transform the economics
of innovation, segmentation and differentiation for most businesses."
It is how you use IT for
business value that makes the difference.
"They are learning that IT purchases tied to a company's business strategy
have the most clear-cut business value, as expressed in traditional
financial terms like Net Present Value (NPV) and payback. Moreover, when IT
solutions and business strategy are woven together, companies are finding that
business benefits are often broader and deeper than expected."
Some new ways are evaluating the business value includes Microsoft's Rapid
Economic Justification program, revenue distance of Wharton, and an user
simpler classification of regulatory must have, strategic , and profitability
(based on ROI).
|